Free surface intake vortices: theoretical model and measurements
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Axially stretched free-surface vortices occur at low-head hydropower intakes under specific flow and geometric conditions. When they are sufficiently strong, they can harm performance or cause premature failure of mechanical components such as turbine blades or guide vanes. Laboratory-scale experimental models are currently used to assess the risk of vortex formation during the design phase, but uncertainty remains as to how vortex characteristics translate from the laboratory scale to the much larger scale of an actual hydropower plant. This paper proposes a semi-empirical model that roughly predicts how the approach flow and intake geometry determine the key vortex characteristics (the core radius, bulk circulation and the depth of the free surface depression). The model is developed using detailed velocity measurements of the approach flow and the flow inside the vortex in a laboratory-scale physical model, using analytical models and insights drawn from previous work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it