MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006729454 · doi:10.1186/1471-2407-8-89

Sex-specific incidence and temporal trends in solid tumours in young people from Northern England, 1968–2005

2008· article· en· W2006729454 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Cancer · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMale Breast Health Studies
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
FundersBupa FoundationChildren's Cancer Research Fund
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)DemographyMedicinePopulationCancer registrySex ratioRhabdomyosarcomaEtiologySex characteristicsPathologyInternal medicineSarcoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: This study examined sex-specific patterns and temporal trends in the incidence of solid tumours in the Northern Region of England from 1968 to 2005. This updates earlier analyses from the region where sex was not considered in depth. Sex-specific analyses were carried out to determine whether sex differences might provide clues to aetiology. METHODS: Details of 3576 cases, aged 0-24 years, were obtained from a specialist population-based cancer registry. There were 1843 males (886 aged 0-14 years and 957 aged 15-24 years) and 1733 females (791 aged 0-14 years and 942 aged 15-24 years). Age-standardized incidence rates (per million population) were calculated. Linear regression was used to analyze temporal trends in incidence and annual percentage changes were estimated. Analyses were stratified by sex and by age-group. RESULTS: There were marked differences in incidence patterns and trends between males and females and also between age-groups. For males central nervous system (CNS) tumours formed the largest proportion of under-15 cases and germ cell tumours was the largest group in the 15-24's, whilst for females CNS tumours dominated in the under-15's and carcinomas in the older group. For 0-14 year olds there were male-specific increases in the incidence of rhabdomyosarcoma (2.4% per annum; 95% CI: 0.2%-4.5%) and non-melanotic skin cancer (9.6%; 95% CI: 0.0%-19.2%) and female-specific increases for sympathetic nervous system tumours (2.2%; 95% CI: 0.4%-3.9%), gonadal germ cell tumours (8.6%; 95% CI: 4.3%-12.9%) and non-gonadal germ cell tumours (5.4%; 95% CI: 2.8%-7.9%). For 15-24 year olds, there were male-specific increases in gonadal germ cell tumours (1.9%; 95% CI: 0.3%-3.4%), non-gonadal germ cell tumours (4.4%; 95% CI: 1.1%-7.7%) and non-melanotic skin cancer (4.7%; 95% CI: 0.5%-8.9%) and female-specific increases for osteosarcoma (3.5%; 95% CI: 0.5%-6.5%), thyroid cancer (2.8%; 95% CI: 0.1%-5.6%) and melanoma (4.6%; 95% CI: 2.2%-7.1%). CONCLUSION: This study has highlighted notable differences between the sexes in incidence patterns and trends for solid tumours. Some of these sex-specific differences could have been obscured if males and females had been analysed together. Furthermore, they suggest aetiological differences or differential susceptibility to environmental factors between males and females.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it