MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006739045 · doi:10.1109/hpcs.2006.42

Sun Grid Engine Package for OSCAR - A Google Summer Of Code 2005 Project

2006· article· en· W2006739045 on OpenAlexaff
Babu Sundaram, Barbara Chapman, Bernard Li, Maria Mayo, Asim Siddiqui, Steven J.M. Jones

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCode (set theory)GridDatabaseOperating systemProgramming languageGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Software deployment and maintenance is a hard problem, even more so when clusters and grids are involved. Open Source Cluster Application Resources (OSCAR) toolkit is used to install and maintain computing clusters. Grid and cluster software (such as Sun Grid Engine [SGE]) are often complex and huge. SGE is an open-source, community effort sponsored by Sun Microsystems, which offers distributed resource management via powerful queue configuration and job control capabilities. With the increasing adoption of clusters and grid computing, demand grows for mechanisms that facilitate easier installation and maintenance for popular software in this area. Adding SGE support in OSCAR allows cluster owners to realize maximum job throughput and utilize idling CPU cycles. As part of a winning proposal in Google’s Summer of Code 2005, we have developed a package for SGE as part of the OSCAR framework. This project was done with help from open source developers in SGE and OSCAR communities. As a result, a SGE package has been created, tested and made publicly available via OSCAR’s software repository. In this paper, we present the internals of and our experiences with this effort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207