A new concept of isolation bearings for highway steel bridges using shape memory alloys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conventional lead–rubber bearings (LRB) may have a problem of instability and unrecovered deformation with a strong ground motion. To improve the problems, this study proposed a new concept of an isolation device in which shape memory alloy wires were incorporated in an elastomeric bearing. This study illustrated the behavior of shape memory alloy in tension and discussed the variation of stiffness and stress on the hyteresis curves. A three-span continuous steel bridge was used for seismic analyses to compare the performance of lead–rubber bearings with the proposed bearings. This study showed that large residual deformation of LRB occurred even with a weak ground motion of peak ground acceleration (PGA) of 0.2g. The proposed bearings effectively limited the relative displacement of the deck when tested for the strong ground motions and almost recovered the original undeformed shape. However, the proposed bearing increases the demand on bridge columns compared with the LRB.Key words: shape memory alloy, lead–rubber bearings, seismic bridge analysis, isolation device, residual deformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".