MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006785099 · doi:10.1063/1.1519680

Optical coherence and Doppler tomography for monitoring tissue changes induced by laser thermal therapy—An <i>in vivo</i> feasibility study

2003· article· en· W2006785099 on OpenAlexafffund
Victor X. D. Yang, Julius Pekar, Stewart S. W. Lo, Maggie L. Gordon, Brian C. Wilson, I. Alex Vitkin

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Coherence Tomography Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsOptical coherence tomographyLaser Doppler velocimetryDoppler effectLaserMaterials scienceIn vivoOpticsBlood flowCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)ThermalTomographyOptical tomographyBiomedical engineeringRadiologyMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A high-speed optical coherence and Doppler tomography system suitable for real-time monitoring of the microstructural and microvascular tissue changes induced by laser thermal therapy is described. The performance of the system is demonstrated experimentally in vivo by noting the morphological change, manifest as an increase in the optical extinction coefficient, and the reduction in the blood flow during and after laser thermal therapy in an animal model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207