MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006799254 · doi:10.1063/1.2748618

Exact solutions of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation in periodic potential in the presence of external source

2007· article· en· W2006799254 on OpenAlexaff
Emmanuel Kengne, Rémi Vaillancourt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElliptic functionTrigonometric functionsJacobi elliptic functionsJacobian matrix and determinantMathematical analysisGross–Pitaevskii equationElliptic integralMathematicsQuarter periodElliptic curveElliptic rational functionsTrigonometryPeriodic waveLimit (mathematics)Mathematical physicsPhysicsApplied mathematicsTraveling waveNonlinear systemQuantum mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exact periodic solutions, solitonlike solutions, singular solitary, and singular trigonometric wave solutions of the time-dependent Gross-Pitaevskii equation (GPE) with elliptic function potential in the presence of external source are analyzed. A simple approach that applies equally to both attractive and repulsive time-dependent GPE and allows one to find an extensive list of explicit periodic solutions of the GPE in terms of the Jacobian elliptic functions is developed. In the limit as the elliptic modulus tends to unity or to zero, the linear solutions, in either the Jacobian elliptic cosine or the Jacobian elliptic function of third order, give solitonlike solutions, while the rational solutions in these elliptic functions lead to singular solitary or trigonometric wave solutions. The stability of these solutions is investigated numerically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesFrench-language works237,207