MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006803049 · doi:10.1063/1.1522380

Asymptotic analysis of a surface-interfacial wave interaction

2002· article· en· W2006803049 on OpenAlex
Mirmosadegh Jamali, Brian Seymour, Gregory A. Lawrence

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOcean Waves and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsWavelengthSurface waveMechanicsAsymptotic analysisPerturbation theory (quantum mechanics)Classical mechanicsSurface (topology)Perturbation (astronomy)Mathematical analysisOpticsGeometryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The three-dimensional interaction of a surface wave with two oblique interfacial waves in a horizontally infinite two-layer fluid is analyzed asymptotically. The nondimensional density difference is taken as a perturbation parameter and simple expressions for the growth rates and kinematic properties of the waves are obtained. The results show that the interfacial wavelengths are an order smaller than the surface wavelength. Also, to the leading-order approximation, the interfacial waves have a frequency half that of the surface wave, and their directions differ by 180° in the horizontal plane. The interaction coefficients are found to be equal at the leading order. The asymptotic solution is compared with the exact solution, and an excellent agreement is obtained for the range of applicability of the asymptotic theory. The analysis is extended to interactions in a medium with sidewalls. A previous laboratory flume study is addressed, and the asymptotic theory is used to explain the experimental observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it