MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006810291 · doi:10.1300/j147v26n03_02

An Exploration of Supervisor's and Manager's Responses to Child Welfare Reform

2002· article· en· W2006810291 on OpenAlexaff
Cheryl Regehr, Shirley Chau, Bruce Leslie, Phillip Howe

Bibliographic record

VenueAdministration in Social Work · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Work Education and Practice
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccountabilityStressorWelfareSupervisorPsychologyWelfare reformBusinessClinical psychologyPolitical scienceEconomicsManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This mixed methods study attempts to identify stress in child welfare supervisors and managers in light of recent changes in practice and increased demands on child welfare services. The quantitative component of this study revealed high rates of exposure to critical events and high levels of accountability. In the end, 48.7% of managers and supervisors fell in the high or severe range of post-traumatic symptoms on the Impact of Event Scale. The qualitative component underscored the stressors associated with high staff turnover, increased accountability and the pressure to support staff in light of these factors. A concerning outcome was the risk that highly skilled and experienced leaders in child welfare are giving up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdministration in Social WorkSame topicSocial Work Education and PracticeFrench-language works237,207