MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006816865 · doi:10.1097/ypg.0b013e32832a4f95

Support for tryptophan hydroxylase-2 as a susceptibility gene for bipolar affective disorder

2009· article· en· W2006816865 on OpenAlexaff
Siobhan Roche, Patrick O. McKeon

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric Genetics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTPH2Linkage disequilibriumTransmission disequilibrium testSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneticsTryptophan hydroxylaseBipolar disorderGenetic associationBiologySerotonergicGeneNeuroscienceGenotypeSerotoninCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bipolar affective disorder (BPAD) is a highly inherited genetic disorder and may be caused in part by deficits in serotonergic neurotransmission. We investigated whether variants within the tryptophan hydroxylase-2 (TPH2) gene, which is required for the synthesis of serotonin (5-HT), are associated with susceptibility to developing BPAD. Thirteen single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within TPH2 were genotyped in a collection of 151 Irish BPAD type I trios and were tested for association using the transmission disequilibrium test. SNPs rs1386482 and rs1386486, which are in very strong linkage disequilibrium, were associated with BPAD (P=0.006). The association retained significance after a correction for multiple testing. The associated SNPs are in perfect linkage disequilibrium with SNPs previously associated with BPAD (rs4290270) and impulsivity (rs1386483), a core trait of BPAD. These results strongly support a role for TPH2 in the aetiology of BPAD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatric GeneticsSame topicBipolar Disorder and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207