MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006825361 · doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.017

Implantation of 2 trabecular microbypass stents in a patient with primary open-angle glaucoma refractory to previous glaucoma-filtering surgeries

2014· article· en· W2006825361 on OpenAlexaff
Kelsey A. Roelofs, Sourabh Arora, Michael W. Dorey

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlaucomaMedicineOpen angle glaucomaOphthalmologyRefractory (planetary science)SurgeryOptometryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: A 77-year-old woman with primary open-angle glaucoma was referred for surgical evaluation after failing to achieve target intraocular pressure (IOP) despite previous combined phacotrabeculectomy and Ahmed valve implantations. The IOP prior to surgery was 28 mm Hg on topical dorzolamide-timolol, latanoprost, and brimonidine. Trabecular bypass surgery with implantation of 2 iStents was performed. The IOP decreased by 11 mm Hg to 17 mm Hg after surgery and has remained stable for 2 years. This is the first published case reporting this magnitude of IOP reduction sustained for more than 2 years following insertion of 2 trabecular microbypass stents in a patient who had previous glaucoma-filtering surgeries. Further prospective studies are needed to establish expanded surgical indications for implantation of trabecular microbypass stents. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.939

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cataract & Refractive SurgerySame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207