MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Disparate effects of long-term potentiation on evoked potentials and single CA1 neurons in the hippocampus of anesthetized rats

2000· article· en· W2006825510 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Martin, Matthew L. Shapiro

Bibliographic record

VenueHippocampus · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLong-term potentiationNeuroscienceHippocampal formationHippocampusElectrophysiologyChemistrySchaffer collateralPsychologyExcitatory postsynaptic potentialInhibitory postsynaptic potentialReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To examine the effects of long-term potentiation (LTP) on individual neurons in the intact brain, anesthetized rats were implanted with a recording stereotrode in the right CA1 layer of the hippocampus and a stimulating electrode in the right and left CA3 layers. The evoked and spontaneous firing of single CA1 neurons was characterized before and after LTP of the contralateral (commissural) Schaffer collaterals and again after LTP of the ipsilateral (associational) Schaffer collaterals. Individual CA1 neurons displayed either increases or decreases in evoked and spontaneous firing after LTP. As many as five discriminated cells were recorded simultaneously, and they typically responded discordantly, so that after LTP, firing in some neurons increased while in others it decreased. The response of individual neurons to in vivo LTP may be modulated by heterogeneous synaptic changes on individual and local groups of cells, and by changes in feed-forward excitation and inhibition provided by local hippocampal circuitry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHippocampusSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207