MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006831092 · doi:10.1021/ie801806t

Handling Inequality Constraints in Optimal Control by Problem Reformulation

2009· article· en· W2006831092 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsOptimal controlPiecewiseInterval (graph theory)Mathematical optimizationControl variableControl theory (sociology)Constraint (computer-aided design)Temperature controlDynamic programmingMathematicsConstant (computer programming)Control (management)Optimization problemVariable (mathematics)Sensitivity (control systems)Computer scienceControl engineeringEngineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Establishment of optimal control for systems, where constraints involve both control and state, is very difficult. In some problems the difficulty is reduced significantly by transforming the optimal control problem. For illustration, the optimal control of a nonisothermal fed-batch reactor with heat removal constraint is considered. Although there are only two control variables, the feed rate and the temperature, the heat removal rate constraint makes the optimal control problem very difficult. To parametrize the optimal control problem, the time interval is divided into P time stages of variable length, and piecewise constant control is used at each time stage. Establishment of the optimal control policy is very challenging owing to the low sensitivity, the heat removal constraint, and the need for a large number of time stages for adequate approximation. However, by reformulating the optimal control problem where heat generation, rather than temperature, is used as a control variable, we are able to get greater accuracy with a smaller number of time stages. The optimal control policy is established with iterative dynamic programming and checked with LJ-optimization procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it