MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006840149 · doi:10.1109/isgt-la.2011.6083195

Integrating distributed generation with Smart Grid enabling technologies

2011· article· en· W2006840149 on OpenAlexaff
Rodrigo Hidalgo, Chad Abbey, G. Joós

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmart gridDistributed generationComputer scienceSoftware deploymentKey (lock)GridSystems engineeringRisk analysis (engineering)Process managementDistributed computingComputer securityRenewable energyEngineeringBusinessSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of distributed generation and Smart Grid enabling technologies and concepts to power systems has been widely accepted by the industry and academia as the key to achieve a more reliable, efficient, and secure grid, with an active participation from customers, and environmentally sustainable. However, there is a lack of information about the costs and economic benefits of research and development projects about distributed generation and Smart Grids. This paper proposes a methodology for the technical and economic analysis of the implementation of a distributed generator into a distribution network, combined with an automatic voltage control and a dynamic line rating tool. The methodology is applied to a case study to show the technical impacts and performance of the network, and the economic feasibility of the projects. A better understanding of cost - benefit analyses of such initiatives will foster de deployment of distributed generation and Smart Grid projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.163
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207