Bibliographic record
Abstract
The book under review here consists largely of articles appearing in various journals between 2000 and 2003 in response to the publication of Alexander Wendt’s Social Theory of International Politics (STIP). Three chapters, however, are new. Two, by Drulak and Sarvary, bring the collection up to Wendt’s 2003 article on the world state (WS). The final chapter is a response by Wendt. His response in terms of STIP is fairly limited: Wendt is reasonably satisfied with what he did. However, the critiques in particular and the exchange are valuable guides to some significant issues in IR theory and in the philosophies of science and of social science. As well, there are some substantial suggestions that would contribute notably to IR theory, whether or not they would be acceptable to Wendt. Wendt’s response goes well beyond a simple reply to his critics, however, instead presenting a far more audacious approach based on a quantum theory of consciousness. Erik Ringmar argued in 1997 that there were two Wendts: the first focused on structurationism and scientific realism as ways of thinking about IR, while the second left scientific realism for constructivism, and applied that to IR theory. Writing before STIP was published, Ringmar was mistaken about the fate of scientific realism in Wendt’s thought, and there are clear elements of agent–structure thinking remaining in STIP and its associated articles (e.g. ‘Anarchy’, ‘Collective Identity Formation’ and WS). Strategic choices made by Wendt in STIP, resulting in his strong emphasis on the state and the international system, mark an apparent shift in his thinking that sets him at odds with the other contributors in this volume. There now seems to be a third Wendt emerging, flagged most clearly in his turn to quantum theory, but also seen in his argument for the state as a person (SP), a theme that his quantum consciousness approach would support. But there are also continuities. These include his adoption of scientific realism, the central role of the state and, possibly, the teleological mode of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".