MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006917945 · doi:10.4000/histoire-cnrs.1532

Des faits à l’interprétation : l’histoire au prétoire

2007· article· fr· W2006917945 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Olivier Lévy-Dumoulin

Bibliographic record

VenueLa Revue pour l’histoire du CNRS · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

De plus en plus d’historiens s’interrogent, non sans quelques réticences, sur leur discipline, en écrivant « l’histoire de l’histoire » ou en ayant recours à l’épistémologie. Quels sont les évolutions et les avatars de la profession ? Comment perçoit-on l’expertise ou l’audit en histoire ? Quelles en sont les accointances avec le privé, les affinités avec le système judiciaire et l’appareil médiatique ? Olivier Lévy-Dumoulin s’intéresse au rôle social de l’historien sous une Ve République inscrite plus que jamais dans un processus de mondialisation. Il transporte ensuite le débat outre-Atlantique, au Canada en l’occurrence, où les historiens jouissent du statut d’« expert witness » devant les tribunaux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0170.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa Revue pour l’histoire du CNRSSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207