MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006919671 · doi:10.1002/ejic.200600659

Cyclodimethylsiloxane (Me<sub>2</sub>SiO)<i><sub>m</sub></i> (<i>m</i> = 3–6) Ring Transformations on Reactions with AgSbF<sub>6</sub>; Crystal Structure of Ag(Me<sub>2</sub>SiO)<sub>7</sub>SbF<sub>6</sub>

2006· article· en· W2006919671 on OpenAlex
A. Decken, Francis A. LeBlanc, Jack Passmore, Xinping Wang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Inorganic Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryRing (chemistry)Lewis acids and basesSiliconMetalCrystal structureCrystallographyTransition metalPolymer chemistryStereochemistryMedicinal chemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The reaction of D m (D = Me 2 SiO, m = 3–6) with silver hexafluoroantimonate in liquid SO 2 affords a mixture of AgD n SbF 6 ( n = 6–8) complexes. Upon the addition of CH 3 CN, Ag + ‐directed ring transformations are effected, which allows for the isolation of neat D n ( n = 6–8). The AgD n + cations are rare examples of Lewis acid donor complexes of silicon ethers and Ag + oxygen donor complexes, and their isolation implies that numerous metal cation cyclosiloxanes can be prepared from readily available starting materials.(© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2006)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it