Symmetry-Based <sup>29</sup>Si Dipolar Recoupling Magic Angle Spinning NMR Spectroscopy: A New Method for Investigating Three-Dimensional Structures of Zeolite Frameworks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new 29Si solid-state MAS NMR experiment is described for investigating the framework structures of pure silica zeolites. The symmetry-based homonuclear dipolar recoupling sequence SR26411 has been incorporated into a two-dimensional NMR experiment to probe the Si-O-Si bonding connectivities and long-range Si-Si distances in zeolite frameworks. This dipolar recoupling sequence is shown to have a number of advantages over the J-coupling-based INADEQUATE experiment. For the clathrasil Sigma-2, it is demonstrated that there is excellent agreement between experimental double-quantum build-up curves obtained from a series of two-dimensional double-quantum correlation spectra and simulated curves which consider all Si-Si distances out to 8 A. This result suggests that this experiment could be used to solve zeolite frameworks with unknown structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".