MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006984752 · doi:10.1159/000124991

Subfornical Organ Connections with Septal Neurons Projecting to the Median Eminence

2008· article· en· W2006984752 on OpenAlexaff
Sean D. Donevan, Alastair V. Ferguson

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroendocrinology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedian eminenceGanglionic eminenceInternal medicineSubfornical organEndocrinologyStimulationLuteinizing hormoneNeuroscienceNeuronBiologyMedicineHypothalamusCentral nervous systemHormoneAngiotensin IICerebrumReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have examined the effect of electrical stimulation in the subfornical organ (SFO) on the activity of neurons in the medial septum and diagonal band of Broca (MS-DBB) which project to the median eminence in the rat. Previous studies have suggested that septal neurons with such projections are luteinizing hormone releasing hormone neurons. Extracellular single-unit recordings were obtained from 69 neurons in the MS-DBB which were antidromically identified as projecting to the median eminence. Electrical stimulation (100-400 microA) in the SFO resulted in a relatively short-latency (22.8 +/- 0.8 ms), short-duration (9.2 +/- 0.8 ms) activation of 85% of 41 antidromically identified MS-DBB neurons tested. One neuron was inhibited by SFO stimulation, while the remaining 12% were unaffected. Stimulation in nearby regions, including the hippocampal commissure and paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus, failed to elicit a similar excitatory response from 19 identified MS-DBB neurons. These results identify a neuronal pathway between the SFO and septal neurons which project to the median eminence, supporting a possible role for the SFO in the control of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone release and hence gonadotropin secretion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroendocrinologySame topicNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorFrench-language works237,207