MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006985434 · doi:10.1016/s0840-4704(10)60337-7

Can Leadership Make a Difference?

2004· article· en· W2006985434 on OpenAlexaff
Jocelyne Wong, Robert E. Modrow

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Management Forum · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInnovations in Medical Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Process (computing)Health carePublic relationsShared leadershipTransactional leadershipLeadership developmentLeadership styleLeadershipNeuroleadershipPolitical sciencePsychologyBusinessKnowledge managementComputer scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Strong leadership is needed to reform the healthcare system in an accountable and transparent manner. This article examines the context of leadership development programs and the conditions that lead to their success as measured by effective outcomes. The article includes a discussion of evaluating leadership performance in the context of 360-degree feedback. In light of the current healthcare climate, caution should be exercised in implementing leadership training programs and the 360-degree process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.016
Scholarly communication0.0130.015
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare Management ForumSame topicInnovations in Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207