Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les années 1896-1897 marquent un tournant dans l’histoire du théâtre en France. Deux spectacles importants sont alors produits : d’une part, la présentation d’ Ubu roi au Théâtre de l’Oeuvre; d’autre part, celle de Cyrano de Bergerac au Théâtre de la Porte Saint-Martin. La première représentation est porteuse d’avenir, autant dans l’esthétique de la mise en scène que dans l’écriture dramatique; la seconde marque le triomphe du théâtre romantique, presque un demi-siècle après la fin de ce mouvement littéraire. En analysant en détail ces deux productions contemporaines, on parvient non seulement à opposer le désordre de la première à l’ordre de la seconde; on met également au jour deux types de spectacle : le spectacle de rupture et le spectacle de réconciliation. C’est dans la tension entre rupture et réconciliation que se déroulera la vie théâtrale française pendant tout le XX e siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".