Un homme et son journal : comment Jules-Paul Tardivel « domestiqua » La Vérité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 1881, Jules-Paul Tardivel lance à Québec La Vérité, un journal de combat ultramontain. Tardivel porte ce journal à bout de bras, mais il n'est pas seul : il est soutenu par un réseau ultramontain encore très actif à cette époque. En 1890, Tardivel fait face à des difficultés matérielles telles que la survie du journal est sérieusement mise en péril. Les amis ultramontains de Tardivel sont alors mis à contribution pour trouver une solution. Plusieurs propositions sont évoquées, mais Tardivel, ne voulant pas partager la direction du journal, trouvera finalement une solution lui permettant de demeurer le seul maître à bord. Cette incursion dans l'histoire de ce journal, rendue possible grâce à une volumineuse correspondance, permet de comprendre un aspect du rôle du réseau ultramontain dans la construction de La Vérité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".