MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007016304 · doi:10.1063/1.1535427

Structural and spectroscopic trends in the ground states of the monohalosilylenes: Emission spectroscopy of jet-cooled HSiI and DSiI

2003· article· en· W2007016304 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Brandon S. Tackett, Dennis J. Clouthier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRyerson UniversityUniversity of KentuckyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsElectronegativityGround stateChemistryIsotopomersAtomic physicsJet (fluid)Bond lengthSpectroscopyExcitationMolecular geometryEmission spectrumSpectral linePhysicsCrystallographyMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single vibronic level emission spectra of jet-cooled HSiI and DSiI have been recorded by laser excitation of selected bands of the Ã1A″–X̃1A′ electronic transition. The data have been used to derive the ground state harmonic frequencies and anharmonicities for both isotopomers. A normal coordinate analysis of the harmonic frequencies yielded reliable values for five of the six force constants. Using previously determined ground state rotational constants and the force field data, average (rz) and approximate equilibrium (rez) structures were calculated, with rez(SiH)=1.5151(2) Å, rez(SiI)=2.4610(1) Å, and θez(HSiI)=92.5(1)°. A comparison of trends in the structural parameters and vibrational frequencies of the monohalosilylenes shows that the bond angle increases significantly and the Si–H bond length decreases slightly with heavier halogen substitution. These trends have been rationalized based on the inductive effect and the electronegativity of the halogen substituent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207