MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2007025186 · doi:10.1139/y02-055

MK801 impairs thermoregulation in the heat

2002· article· en· W2007025186 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Frédéric Canini, Nadine Simler, Lionel Bourdon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDélégation Générale pour l'Armement
KeywordsThermoregulationDopamineNMDA receptorEndocrinologyDopaminergicInternal medicineDizocilpineAntagonistGlutamate receptorChemistryThermogenesisReceptorBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of MK801 (dizocilpine), a glutamate NMDA receptor antagonist, on thermoregulation in the heat were studied in awake rats exposed to 40 degrees C ambient temperature until their body core temperature reached 43 degrees C. Under these conditions, MK801-treated rats exhibited enhanced locomotor activity and a steady rise in body core temperature, which reduced the heat exposure duration required to reach 43 degrees C. Since MK801-treated rats also showed increased striatal dopaminergic metabolism at thermoneutrality, the role of dopamine in the MK801-induced impairment of thermoregulation in the heat was determined using co-treatment with SCH23390, a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist. SCH23390 normalized the locomotor activity in the heat without any effect on the heat exposure duration. These results suggest that the MK801-induced impairment of thermoregulation in the heat is related to neither a dopamine metabolism alteration nor a locomotor activity enhancement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology→Same topicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→