Dependence of charge buildup in the polyimide on the incident electron energy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elemental silver was diffused in a number of polyimide (C22H10N2O5, PMDA-ODA, Kapton-H) samples using the developed method of 6MeV electron irradiation. The virgin and the silver diffused polyimide samples, each of dimension 12×12×25μm, were irradiated with electrons of different energies, varying from 2to20keV. Each sample was irradiated with single energy electrons for a period of 300s, at a current density of ∼50nA∕cm2. The variations in the sample current and the backscattered electron current with the irradiation period were studied. The gaseous species evolved from the polyimide during electron irradiation were investigated by a quadrupole mass spectrometer. The negative charge stored and the surface potential developed in the polyimide increased with increasing electron energy, even though the irradiation period and the incident electron current were kept constant. This phenomenon is attributed to the decrease in the number of the backscattered electrons and the increase in the number of charged gaseous species that evolved from the polyimide surface with increasing energy of the incident electrons. For the same electron energy and fluence, the charge stored in the silver diffused polyimide was lower than that developed in the virgin polyimide. This property of the silver diffused polyimide is desirable for the space applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".