Microsprings and microcantilevers: studies of mechanical response
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Porous thin films with unique microstructures have been fabricated with the glancing angle deposition technique. This technique utilizes highly oblique deposition angles to make use of initial growth and shadowing conditions, which allow thin films consisting of microsprings and arrays of microcantilevers to be engineered with nanometre scale control. The mechanical properties of these microstructured films were studied with a nanoindentation technique. Several microscopic `springbed' films were tested over a range of forces using a spherical indenter tip. The geometries of the microsprings were varied, and a number of different materials were used to fabricate these films, which were typically a few micrometres thick. Slanted post arrays, resembling microscopic cantilevers, were also subjected to nanoindentation tests. The results of initial experiments and theory show that these microstructures behave in a manner analogous to macroscopic springs and cantilevers, and may offer opportunities for application as resonator devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it