MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lack of CD27 in myeloma delineates different presentation and outcome

2005· article· en· W2007047214 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Moreau, Nelly Robillard, Gaëtan Jégo, Catherine Pellat, Steven Le Gouill, Soraya Thoumi, Hervé Avet‐Loiseau, Jean‐Luc Harousseau, Régis Bataille

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Haematology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiple myelomaMedicineInternal medicinePresentation (obstetrics)Plasma cellOverall survivalGastroenterologyPathologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CD27 expression was evaluated on normal plasma cells (PC), PC from patients with multiple myeloma (MM) at diagnosis or relapse and on human myeloma cell lines (HMCL). CD27 was expressed by normal PC but was lacking in PC from MM patients at diagnosis (36%) and relapse (47%), and in HMCL (92%). The prognostic impact of CD27 expression was evaluated in 42 patients with de novo MM. Overall survival was 92% at 3 years in CD27(+) vs. 50% in CD27(-) MM (P = 0.017). CD27 expression seems to delineate two important subsets of MM with different presenting features and clinical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of HaematologySame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207