Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The theory of verb-assignment in the traditional argument structure cannot offer a satisfactory explanation for the specific grammatical structures and semantic features of Chinese verb-resultative constructions. By distinguishing the conceptual content from the grammatical meaning and representing the sentence-level conceptual content in Conceptual Frames, the grammatical realization rules of verb-resultative constructions can be analyzed more accurately. The conceptual frame of a verb-resultative construction is mainly composed of action conceptual structure and causation conceptual structure; and the participants in these two conceptual structures will be conflated and realized as the relevant argument roles in the semantic structure. When the Causee is conflated with different participants in the action conceptual structure, it can be construed in different ways, and realized in different positions in the corresponding semantic and grammatical structures, thereby ultimately influencing the whole configuration of the verb-resultative construction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.120 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it