Performance of titanium alloy sintered porous‐surfaced (SPS) implants supporting mandibular overdentures during a 20‐year prospective study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess short, sintered porous-surfaced (SPS), press-fit implants with mandibular overdentures to restore edentulous patients with severe mandibular resorption. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implant lengths of 7, 8, 9, and 10 mm were used, all with 2-mm polished collars, making the designed intrabony lengths 5, 6, 7, and 8 mm. Each patient received three non-splinted implants placed using a two-stage protocol. RESULTS: Only 22 (with 53 implants) of the original 52 patients were available after 20 years. All but one of these patients was functioning with their implant-retained overdentures. Life table analysis accounted for all patients and implants, and showed a 20-year survival of 73.4%. Analysis of carefully standardized radiographs revealed mean cumulative bone loss after 20 years of 0.67 mm relative to the polished collar-SPS junction. CONCLUSIONS: Short SPS implants with mandibular overdentures can provide an acceptable treatment over a 20-year period for fully edentulous patients with severe alveolar resorption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".