Reappraisal of patterns of nonmarine cryptodiran turtle carotid circulation: Evidence from osteological correlates and soft tissues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The turtle cranial circulation has been employed as an important source of phylogenetic information, but recent conflicting hypotheses of relationship within Testudinata suggest reevaluation of the utility of characters drawn from this complex. As a component of a comprehensive character analysis, the osteological correlates of the nonmarine cryptodiran turtle carotid circulation are herein subjected to high-resolution X-ray computed tomography, reassessed, and statistically investigated. Three different patterns of osteological correlates, indicating three disparate cranial circulatory patterns, are described, and this finding is corroborated by evidence from circulatory soft tissues. Members of the Trionychia and Kinosternoidea exhibit patterns that differ from the more widespread condition found in testudinoid taxa. This result differs from previous work, which has indicated the presence of only two major cranial circulatory patterns, and suggests that while cranial circulatory features may be phylogenetically informative, the information contained within them indicates patterns of relationship different from those previously hypothesized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".