MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007131458 · doi:10.4161/cc.23592

ATM-dependent phosphorylation of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K promotes p53 transcriptional activation in response to DNA damage

2013· article· en· W2007131458 on OpenAlexaff
Abdeladim Moumen, Christine Magill, Katherine L. Dry, Stephen P. Jackson

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsResponse Biomedical (Canada)
FundersCancer Research UKWellcome Trust
KeywordsDNA damageHeterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteinBiologyPhosphorylationRibonucleoproteinCell biologyTranscription (linguistics)DNAMolecular biologyCell nucleusGeneticsRNAGeneCytoplasm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous work has established that heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (hnRNP K) is stabilized in an ATM-dependent manner in response to DNA damage and acts as a cofactor for p53-mediated transcription. Here, we show that in response to DNA damage caused by ionizing radiation, hnRNP K is phosphorylated in an ATM-dependent manner. Furthermore, our data indicate that ATM-dependent hnRNP K phosphorylation is required for its stabilization and its function as a p53 transcriptional cofactor in response to DNA damage. These findings thereby establish hnRNP K as an ATM target and help define how ATM orchestrates p53-dependent transcriptional responses in response to genotoxic stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207