MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007152383 · doi:10.1143/jjap.50.065201

Adsorption Density Control of Ferritin Molecules by Multistep Alternate Coating

2011· article· en· W2007152383 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Itsuo Hanasaki, Yoshitada Isono, Bin Zheng, Yukiharu Uraoka, Ichiro Yamashita

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAdsorptionMoleculeCoatingTitaniumChemistryFerritinSubstrate (aquarium)Drop (telecommunication)Monte Carlo methodChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have developed a process to control adsorption density of ferritin molecules on SiO2 surface in the high-density regime. We use two types of ferritin molecules: titanium-binding peptide ferritin (TBF) and Fer8S. The former has a property to get adsorbed on the SiO2 surface, and it is positively charged in the buffer solution. The latter is negatively charged in the solution. Exposure of the TBF solution on the substrate followed by rinse in water and drying leads to 4.6×103 molecules/µm2 of adsorption density, corresponding to a half of the coverage of the whole surface. Subsequent drop of the Fer8S solution leads to 6.0×103 molecules/µm2, and repeating this alternate coating process enables the full coverage of the surface. We also discuss the dominant factors that determine the adsorption patterns using Monte Carlo simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Journal of Applied PhysicsSame topicPeptidase Inhibition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207