MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007200590 · doi:10.1038/clpt.2012.55

Translational Bioinformatics: Data-driven Drug Discovery and Development

2012· editorial· en· W2007200590 on OpenAlex
Atul J. Butte, Shinya Ito

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · 2012
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersU.S. National Library of MedicineNational Cancer InstituteDavid and Lucile Packard Foundation
KeywordsTranslational bioinformaticsClinical pharmacologyData sharingTranslational researchData scienceDrug reactionDrug discoveryDrug developmentComputer scienceThe InternetClinical trialMedicineBioinformaticsComputational biologyDrugGenomicsPharmacologyWorld Wide WebGenomeBiologyAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internet-accessible computing power and data-sharing mandates now enable researchers to interrogate thousands of publicly available databases containing molecular, clinical, and epidemiological data. With emerging new approaches, translational bioinformatics can now provide answers to previously untouchable questions, ranging from detecting population signals of adverse drug reactions to clinical interpretation of the whole genome. There are challenges, including lack of access to some data sources and software, but there are also overwhelming doses of hopes and expectations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it