Nonstationary Vibration of a Fully Flexible Parallel Kinematic Machine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the problem of the nonstationary vibration of a fully flexible parallel kinematic machine (PKM) that has flexibilities both in links and in joints. In the stationary case, the PKM was treated as a varying structure and the natural frequencies and mode shapes changed with the changes in the PKM configuration, without consideration of the PKM nominal motion. In the nonstationary case as studied in this paper, the nominal motion is included to investigate how it would affect the natural frequencies and mode shapes. To do so, a nonstationary model is developed using the elasto-dynamics method. First, a kinematic model is built based on rigid links and ideal joints, which is used to solve the PKM nominal motion. Second, the kinetic model is developed considering the flexibilities in the links and joints. In this case, the vibration equations would contain the Coriolis and gyroscopic damping matrix and the tangential and normal stiffening matrix, which are the terms resulting from the nominal motion. The instantaneous eigensolutions are obtained from the nonstationary eigenequations. The results show that (i) the slider velocity affects the instantaneous natural frequencies more than the slider acceleration; and (ii) the nominal motion has an effect on the system eigencharacteristics (e.g., the nonstationary frequencies can be higher or lower than the stationary ones) but the effect is small in an absolute amount (within 2.1Hz in natural frequencies presented at set nominal motions of the studied PKM prototype). This is because the extra inertial force from the nominal motion is always much smaller than the stiffness force in the system bodies as long as the bodies are made of hard material. The method presented is more convenient to use for the multibody system with flexible joints than other methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".