MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007249773 · doi:10.1115/omae2005-67165

Studies in the Stability of a Numerical Wave Tank Model for Generation and Propagation of Steep Nonlinear Long-Crested Surface Waves

2005· article· en· W2007249773 on OpenAlexaff
W. Parsons, R. E. Baddour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAquatic and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsCollege of the North Atlantic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFree surfaceInviscid flowNonlinear systemSpurious relationshipNumerical stabilitySawtooth waveComputationCurvilinear coordinatesMathematical analysisInstabilityMechanicsNumerical analysisMathematicsControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceGeometryPhysicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are studying numerically the problem of generation and propagation of gravity long-crested waves in a tank containing an incompressible inviscid homogeneous fluid initially at rest with a horizontal free surface of finite extent and of infinite depth. A non-orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system, which follows the free surface is constructed which gives a realistic “continuity condition”, since it tracks the entire fluid domain at all times. A depth profile of the potential is assumed, and employed to perform a waveform relaxation algorithm to decouple the discrete Laplacian along dimensional lines, thereby reducing it’s computation over this total fluid domain. In addition, the full nonlinear kinematic and dynamic free surface boundary conditions are utilized in the algorithm, and a suitably tuned numerical beach is used to avoid reflections. It is well known that instability, in the form of generated spurious “sawtooth waves”, plagues this problem, leading to numerical overflow. This makes it very difficult to generate steep waves for sufficiently long simulation times. The authors have struggled with this problem for some time, with significant success, by employing an “aliasing filter”. This paper outlines our ongoing study of the stability of the model, including an analysis of the possible nature of the underlying causes including compatibility conditions. We conclude by giving a simple practical technique for greatly improving the stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAquatic and Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207