Mutational analysis of Lys65 of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amino acid Lys(65) is part of the highly flexible beta3-beta4 loop in the fingers domain of the 66 kDa subunit of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT). Recent crystal data show that the epsilon-amino group of Lys(65) interacts with the gamma-phosphate of the bound deoxynucleoside triphosphate ('dNTP') substrate [Huang, Chopra, Verdine and Harrison (1998) Science 282, 1669-1675]. In order to biochemically define the function of RT Lys(65), we have used site-specific mutagenesis to generate RT with a variety of substitutions at this position, including K65E, K65Q, K65A and K65R. Kinetic analyses demonstrate that if Lys(65) in RT is substituted with an amino acid other than arginine the enzyme exhibits dramatic decreases in the binding affinity (K(m)) for all dNTP substrates, in RT catalytic efficiency (k(cat)/K(m)) and in the mutant enzyme's ability to carry out pyrophosphorolysis, the reverse reaction of DNA synthesis. The pH optimum for the DNA polymerase activity of K65E RT was 6.5, compared to 7.5 for the wild-type enzyme, and 8.0 for the K65R, K65A and K65Q mutants. Molecular modelling studies show that mutations of Lys(65) do not affect the geometry of the loop's alpha-carbon backbone, but rather lead to changes in positioning of the side chains of residues Lys(70) and Arg(72). In particular, Glu in K65E can form a salt bridge with Arg(72), leading to the diminution of the latter residue's interaction with the alpha-phosphate of the dNTP residue. This alteration in dNTP-binding may explain the large pH-dependent changes in both dNTP-binding and catalytic efficiency noted with the enzyme. Furthermore, the K65A, K65Q and K65E mutant enzymes are 100-fold less sensitive to all dideoxynucleoside triphosphate ('ddNTP') inhibitors, whereas the K65R mutation results in a selective 10-fold decrease in binding of ddCTP and ddATP only. This implies that mutations at position 65 in HIV-1 RT influence the nucleotide-binding specificity of the enzyme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".