Acute-on-chronic liver failure: the heart and systemic hemodynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Circulatory abnormalities in cirrhosis include hyperdynamic circulation and cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. The extent of circulatory abnormalities is further exaggerated in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). The mechanism remains unclear and management also needs to be evaluated. RECENT FINDINGS: The predominant mechanism of ACLF is thought to be a systemic inflammatory reaction. Cardiovascular-active factors such as tumor necrosis factor and nitric oxide are increased and cortisol is decreased; the former further dilates the vasculature and the latter decreases the sensitivity to vasoconstrictors. The exaggerated vasodilatation further decreases the cardiac afterload. However, no study has yet demonstrated the benefit of vasodilators/vasoconstrictors in the management of ACLF. Standard medical treatment in this setting is associated with high mortality. Patients treated with molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) had improved serum levels of inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-6, but this was not associated with improved survival. Liver transplantation eventually reverses the cardiovascular abnormalities. SUMMARY: Circulatory abnormalities are exaggerated in ACLF. The predominant mechanism is a systemic inflammatory reaction. Modalities such as MARS improve serum markers of inflammation, but not survival. Liver transplantation is the definitive treatment of the cardiovascular abnormalities of ACLF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".