Performance Characterization of a Thermal Management Concept for High-Density, High-Speed Parallel Optical Interconnects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parallel optical interconnects (POIs) offer capacity advantages for high-density telecomm requirements. Once an array of multi-channel, high-capacity POIs is placed on a board, shelf or telecom rack, it creates a challenging thermal management task. To develop a thermal management concept for high dissipating racks (over 10 kW), capable of keeping a maximum temperature of 80°C for optical components, with tight temperature uniformity requirements of ±1°C between a receiver (Rx) and transmitter (Tx), a fully functional two-shelf telecommunication rack has been built. A thermal management solution was proposed and was based on the implementation of heat pipes embedded into each board. The performance of embedded heat pipes is characterized for densely packaged, high-speed optics applications requiring temperature uniformity and stringent temperature limits. The proposed solution completely meets requirements of power-dense, high speed POIs at the board/shelf level for the typical telecommunication rack. Moreover, it evolves into an enabling strategy for the reliable control of power-dense, temperature-sensitive optical components.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".