Exercise Improves Postischemic Cardiac Function in Males but Not Females
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exercise is a physiological inducer of the cardioprotective heat shock protein, Hsp70. The putative biological events involved in signaling this response exhibit sexual dimorphism. Thus, it was hypothesized that exercise-mediated induction of Hsp70 would demonstrate sex specificity. After treadmill running, male rats exhibited 2-fold greater levels of cardiac Hsp70 relative to the levels in gonadally intact female rats (P<0.001). Ovariectomized female rats exhibited exercise-mediated induction of Hsp70 similar to that observed for male rats, and estrogen treatment in these female rats reversed this effect (P<0.001). Attenuation of Hsp70 signaling by estrogen was non-receptor-mediated, possibly involving a cellular membrane-stabilizing mechanism of action. The physiological importance of this sex-specific hormone-mediated stress response is underscored by the disparity in functional adaptation in response to exercise between male rats and female rats. Exercise markedly improved postischemic left ventricular developed pressure, the maximal rate of contraction, and maximal rate of relaxation, and it reduced left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in male rats (P<0.001). No such benefit of exercise was observed in intact female rats. A causal role for Hsp70 in this sex-specific cardioprotective adaptation was indicated, inasmuch as ablation of Hsp70 induction with antisense oligonucleotides designed against Hsp70 transcripts attenuated improvement in the recovery of cardiac function in exercised male rats (P<0.05). Thus, the sex-specific hormone-mediated Hsp70 response to exercise results in cardioprotective adaptation, preferentially in male rats relative to female rats. These findings suggest that exercise may be more important for males than for females in defending against the effects of heart disease and offer a novel manner by which males may reduce the sex gap in susceptibility to adverse cardiac events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".