MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007344716 · doi:10.7202/1005882ar

Nations francophones et Constitution canadienne

2011· article· fr· W2007344716 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Pierre Foucher

Bibliographic record

VenueFrancophonies d Amérique · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Systems and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesEthnologyJurisprudenceConstitutionLawPhilosophySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le droit des minorités est tributaire de la notion d’État-nation. Cependant, la notion d’État multinational, où coexistent des nations distinctes dans une structure fédérale, commence à être défendue. Le présent texte explore comment le droit constitutionnel, les lois linguistiques et la jurisprudence récente en droits linguistiques au Canada reconnaissent ou non plusieurs nations ou en tirent des conséquences juridiques. Or le paradigme principal de ce droit s’inscrit plutôt dans l’idée qu’il y a une nation canadienne et que les communautés qui la composent sont traitées comme des minorités nationales qui reçoivent soit des droits, soit des protections spéciales dans la structure constitutionnelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrancophonies d AmériqueSame topicPolitical Systems and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207