MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007362178 · doi:10.1109/icics.2011.6173631

Green backbone optical networks: The way forward

2011· article· en· W2007362178 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurvivabilityThe InternetContext (archaeology)Automatically switched optical networkComputer scienceComputer networkOptical Transport NetworkRenewable energyMultiprotocol Label SwitchingTelecommunicationsEfficient energy useOptical switchRouting control planeEngineeringWavelength-division multiplexingOptical performance monitoringQuality of serviceElectrical engineeringElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical transport networks have been considered as one of the dominant energy consumers in the modern Internet, wherein the design toward green communication with awareness of energy saving has received growing attention from both industry and academia. This article reviews green designs in the Internet optical transport backbone, particularly on the current progresses in the development of various energy-saving strategies, such as optical bypass configurations and turning off (or sleeping) equipments, as well as the impact on network survivability and security, and renewable energy use. The article will also discuss how the network control plane should be extended to support the energy-saving functionality in the context of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207