MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007403357 · doi:10.1063/1.1464819

Simulation of short-chain polymer collapse with an explicit solvent

2002· article· en· W2007403357 on OpenAlexaff
James M. Polson, Martin J. Zuckermann

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolymerSolventThermodynamicsChemistryMonomerSolvent effectsChemical physicsMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the equilibrium behavior and dynamics of a polymer collapse transition for a system composed of a short Lennard-Jones (LJ) chain immersed in a LJ solvent for solvent densities in the range of ρ=0.6–0.9 (in LJ reduced units). The monomer hydrophobicity is quantified by a parameter λ∈[0,1] which gives a measure of the strength of attraction between the monomers and solvent particles, and which is given by λ=0 for a purely repulsive interaction and λ=1 for a standard LJ interaction. A transition from the Flory coil to a molten globule is induced by increasing λ. Generally, the polymer size decreases with increasing solvent density for all λ. Polymer collapse is induced by changing the hydrophobicity parameter from λ=0 to λ⩾0.5, where the polymer is in a molten globule state. The collapse rate increases monotonically with increasing hydrophobicity and decreases monotonically with increasing solvent density. Doubling the length of the chain from N=20 to N=40 monomers increases the collapse time roughly by a factor of 2, more or less independent of the hydrophobicity and solvent density. We also study the effect of conformational restrictions on polymer collapse using a chain model in which the bond angles are held near 109.5° using a stiff angular harmonic potential, but where free internal rotation is allowed, and find that the collapse times increase considerably with respect to the fully flexible polymer, roughly by a factor of 1.6–3.5. This increase is most pronounced for high solvent densities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207