MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007443836 · doi:10.3138/tjt.17.2.231

Problems of Globalization in Theological Education: An Analysis of Sources

2001· article· en· W2007443836 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Colin O’Rourke

Bibliographic record

VenueToronto Journal of Theology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobalizationSituatedContext (archaeology)ChristianitySociologyPoliticsTheologyChristian theologyReligious studiesEnvironmental ethicsSocial sciencePolitical sciencePhilosophyHistoryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Globalization is a growing concern within North American theological education. It is leading some scholars to re-examine both Christian theology and the way it is taught in the light of increasing recognition of the larger global context within which they are situated. Central to this enterprise is a discussion of how theology and theological education can or should respond to issues raised by those both within and outside the Christian tradition arising from the changing demography of Christianity. Further fuelling the discussion are non-Christian religions in North America and the new political realities of the postcolonial context of many non-Western countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueToronto Journal of TheologySame topicReligious Education and SchoolsFrench-language works237,207