Outbreaks of meningococcal B infection and the 4CMenB vaccine: historical and future perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Strains of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MenB) causing invasive meningococcal disease are genetically diverse; however, only a small number of hyperinvasive lineages (CC32, CC41/44, CC269 and CC162) have dominated during the global spread over the past 50 years. Since the mid-1970s, major outbreaks and hyperendemic disease have been reported in Norway, Cuba, France, Canada, New Zealand (and elsewhere), most recently in the USA. We characterized the epidemiology of these MenB outbreaks and their associated clonal complexes and retrospectively assessed the potential coverage offered by the 4CMenB vaccine, a four-component vaccine developed to help confer protection against a broad range of meningococcal B strains causing disease. Of 21 isolates from four clonal complexes evaluated using both human Serum Bactericidal Assay and the Meningococcal Antigen Testing System, coverage ranged from 67 to 100%. 4CMenB shows good potential as a candidate vaccine to be used in the control of new MenB outbreaks globally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".