MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007482647 · doi:10.1109/pahce.2013.6568349

Automated pre-ictal phase detection algorithm from EEG signals

2013· article· en· W2007482647 on OpenAlexaff
Vesna Zeljković, C. Druzgalski, L. Yequn, Cai Jian, Yangxuan Xin, Milena Bojic, Pedro Mayorga

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsNew York Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyIctalEpilepsyComputer scienceTelemetryProcess (computing)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceNeurosciencePsychologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epilepsy poses a significant burden to society due to associated healthcare costs to treat and control the unpredictable and spontaneous occurrence of seizures. There is a need for a quick screening process that could help neurologists diagnose and determine the patient's treatment. Electroencephalogram has been traditionally used to diagnose patients by evaluating brain functions that might correspond to epilepsy. This research focuses on developing a new classification technique and the prediction of pre-ictal states that announce epileptic seizures, from the direct EEG data analysis. The approach involves the placement of electrodes on critical regions on the patient's head as a part of a telemetry system which communicates with the EEG recorder and the DSP unit that performs automated pre-ictal state detection based on the obtained EEG signal. Studying potential preconditions and alerting the patient about a possible seizure attack so that s/he can take safety precautions has a potential to improve patient care management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207