MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007492661 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450810352

Influence of Operating Conditions and Column Configuration on the Performance of Reactive Distillation Columns with Liquid—Liquid Separators

2003· article· en· W2007492661 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Markus Klöker, Eugeny Y. Kenig, Markus Schmitt, Klaus Althaus, Hartmut Schoenmakers, A Peter Markusse, G. Kwant

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReactive distillationDistillationChemistryChromatographyFractionating columnCatalysisColumn (typography)Butyl acetateProcess (computing)Liquid liquidProcess engineeringOrganic chemistrySolventEngineeringMechanical engineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The synthesis of two different esters, ethyl acetate and hexyl acetate, by heterogeneously catalysed reactive distillation has been studied. The investigated column set‐ups were equipped with liquid—liquid separators for the distillate to separate water from the organic components. Experimental and theoretical investigations of operating conditions and different catalytic column internals, as well as different scales were performed. For the modelling and simulation of the reactive distillation columns, the rate‐based approach was applied. The simulation results are in satisfactory agreement with the experimental data. Performed simulation studies demonstrate the influence of both operating conditions and catalytic internals on the overall process performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicProcess Optimization and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207