MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007505669 · doi:10.3406/bagf.2009.2680

L'événement au cœur de la politique touristique : l'exemple de Montréal (Events as cornerstone of touristic development : the example of Montreal)

2009· article· en· W2007505669 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Florence Smits

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin de l Association de géographes français · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSport and Mega-Event Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionAttractivenessCornerstoneTourismPolitical scienceGeographyEconomyArtEconomicsArchaeologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the 1960 's, Montreal has focused its touristic development and image on events and the creation of public spaces. They include major undertakings such as the Universal Exhibition and Olympic Games as well as festivals and periodic attractions such as the Canadian Grand Prix, Francofolies, and the Montreal High Lights. The strategy has promoted tourism, bolstered the local economy, transformed the urban landscape, impacted Montreal 's image and changed the way residents live. Nevertheless, there has been a decline in Montreal 's attractiveness which may reflect the absence of the strong investment that is necessary to sustain such initiatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin de l Association de géographes françaisSame topicSport and Mega-Event ImpactsFrench-language works237,207