Does male-only fishing influence reproductive success of the female spiny king crab, <i>Paralithodes brevipes</i>?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Male-only fishing for spiny king crab (Paralithodes brevipes) has likely impaired the reproductive success of the stock by decreasing the availability of sperm and (or) male mates. The reproductive success of females in fished populations in 2003 and 2004 was estimated based on female reproductive potential determined in laboratory experiments. Some females had no or partial clutches and showed a low fertilization rate. As female size decreased, the fertilization rate decreased and their clutches became small. These results suggest that mating was impaired by sperm limitation, because risk of sperm limitation increases throughout the reproductive season in fished populations, and smaller females tend to mate later in the reproductive season than larger females of this species. We compared the reproductive success between these years with different fishing pressures. In 2003, the total fishing pressure was high, therefore causing decreases in availability of sperm and males. This likely resulted in the reproductive success of females being lower in 2003 than in 2004.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".