MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007546859 · doi:10.3917/pouv.102.0071

Polices d'Europe

2002· article· fr· W2007546859 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePouvoirs · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Canadian institutionsMontreal Police Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesEuropean unionPhilosophyBusinessInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Un état des lieux des forces de police des États de l’Union européenne, sous forme de tableau comparatif, comprenant une comparaison inédite entre les forces de l’Union européenne et celles des États-Unis d’Amérique. Même si la notion de police comme celle de sécurité intérieure ne revêtent pas les mêmes significations dans les États membres, si les forces sont dissemblables, les missions différentes, une meilleure connaissance des institutions de chacun des pays et des forces chargées d’assurer la sécurité de leurs citoyens permettra toujours de renforcer celle-ci par la mise en commun des expériences, des pratiques, voire des moyens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it