MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007551061 · doi:10.1214/aos/1065705118

Singular Wishart and multivariate beta distributions

2003· article· en· W2007551061 on OpenAlexaff
Muni S. Srivastava

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Annals of Statistics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWishart distributionMathematicsInverse-Wishart distributionMatrix t-distributionMatrix normal distributionScatter matrixLebesgue measureMultivariate normal distributionEstimation of covariance matricesNormal-Wishart distributionCovariance matrixCombinatoricsMathematical analysisPure mathematicsLebesgue integrationMultivariate statisticsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we consider the case when the number of observations n is less than the dimension p of the random vectors which are assumed to be independent and identically distributed as normal with nonsingular covariance matrix. The central and noncentral distributions of the singular Wishart matrix $S=XX'$, where X is the $p \times n$ matrix of observations are derived with respect to Lebesgue measure. Properties of this distribution are given. When the covariance matrix is singular, pseudo singular Wishart distribution is also derived. The result is extended to any distribution of the type $f(XX')$ for the central case. Singular multivariate beta distributions with respect to Lebesgue measure are also given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.263
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations141
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Annals of StatisticsSame topicAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsFrench-language works237,207