MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007570967 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.75.032801

Precise measurement of the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ge</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>mass and its effect on the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">rp</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>process

2007· article· lv· W2007570967 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jason A. Clark, K. S. Sharma, G. Savard, A. F. Levand, J. C. Wang, Zhiyi Zhou, Β. Blank, F. Buchinger, J. E. Crawford, S. Gulick, J. K. P. Lee, D. Seweryniak, W. Trimble

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2007
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsNuclidePenning trapAtomic physicsAlgorithmNuclear physicsComputer scienceElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Penning Trap mass spectrometer has been used to determine the mass excesses of $^{64}\mathrm{Ge}$ and $^{64}\mathrm{Ga}$ as \ensuremath{-}54344(30) keV and \ensuremath{-}58832.5(39) keV, respectively. Under typical conditions used for modeling x-ray bursts, $^{64}\mathrm{Ge}$ is confirmed as a waiting-point nuclide and can contribute up to 35.5 s to the timescale of the $\mathit{rp}$ process at a peak x-ray burst temperature of 1.5 GK.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207